<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5D X AND 5D Mk III?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonwatch.com/5d-x-and-5d-mk-iii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonwatch.com/5d-x-and-5d-mk-iii/</link>
	<description>Canon Rumors and News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 06:36:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: 5D MkIII/X Rumors Round-Up &#124; CanonWatch</title>
		<link>http://www.canonwatch.com/5d-x-and-5d-mk-iii/#comment-424</link>
		<dc:creator>5D MkIII/X Rumors Round-Up &#124; CanonWatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 13:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonwatch.com/?p=2203#comment-424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] what about the supposed split of the 5D line? Should we focus only on a probable 22MP 5DMk3 or is there still some possibility that Canon will [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] what about the supposed split of the 5D line? Should we focus only on a probable 22MP 5DMk3 or is there still some possibility that Canon will [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 8/14 queries in 0.004 seconds using apc
Object Caching 297/302 objects using apc

 Served from: canonwatch.com @ 2013-05-25 12:37:10 by W3 Total Cache -->