<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: [Review] The Amazing EOS 50D, Reloaded</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonwatch.com/review-eos-50d-reloaded/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonwatch.com/review-eos-50d-reloaded/</link>
	<description>Canon Rumors and News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 04:46:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Andreas</title>
		<link>http://www.canonwatch.com/review-eos-50d-reloaded/#comment-6436</link>
		<dc:creator>Andreas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 12:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonwatch.com/?p=5525#comment-6436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am a happy 50D user - but I find it hard to imaginge how this ISO 6400 was worked on: My results are good (or usable, depending on subject &amp; light - but sometimes also stunning) up to 3200, but 6400 I found up to now unusable...

The 50D is a great camera, if you shoot it RAW. It is a less than great one if shot JPEG, I think.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a happy 50D user &#8211; but I find it hard to imaginge how this ISO 6400 was worked on: My results are good (or usable, depending on subject &amp; light &#8211; but sometimes also stunning) up to 3200, but 6400 I found up to now unusable&#8230;</p>
<p>The 50D is a great camera, if you shoot it RAW. It is a less than great one if shot JPEG, I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.canonwatch.com/review-eos-50d-reloaded/#comment-6418</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 21:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonwatch.com/?p=5525#comment-6418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with most of what is said. The 7d was such a...upgrade( what the 60d should have been). I would still spend the extra 300(used) for the 7d. Just for the focusing system. If the 40d had micro adjust. I would save the 200 and get it. Lol The 50d is kind of the rock in a hard place.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with most of what is said. The 7d was such a&#8230;upgrade( what the 60d should have been). I would still spend the extra 300(used) for the 7d. Just for the focusing system. If the 40d had micro adjust. I would save the 200 and get it. Lol The 50d is kind of the rock in a hard place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.canonwatch.com/review-eos-50d-reloaded/#comment-6416</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 21:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonwatch.com/?p=5525#comment-6416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with most of what is said. The 7d was such a...upgrade( what the 60d should have been). I would still spend the extra 300(used) for the 7d. Just for the focusing system.
If the 40d had micro adjust. I would save the 200 and get it. Lol
The 50d is kind of the rock in a hard place.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with most of what is said. The 7d was such a&#8230;upgrade( what the 60d should have been). I would still spend the extra 300(used) for the 7d. Just for the focusing system.<br />
If the 40d had micro adjust. I would save the 200 and get it. Lol<br />
The 50d is kind of the rock in a hard place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lensporn.net</title>
		<link>http://www.canonwatch.com/review-eos-50d-reloaded/#comment-6411</link>
		<dc:creator>Lensporn.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 18:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonwatch.com/?p=5525#comment-6411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with everything apart from the 60D lacking multiple flash support, it can wirelessly trigger an unlimited amount of flashes in two separate groups.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with everything apart from the 60D lacking multiple flash support, it can wirelessly trigger an unlimited amount of flashes in two separate groups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 2/14 queries in 0.004 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 331/336 objects using apc

 Served from: canonwatch.com @ 2013-05-26 10:46:56 by W3 Total Cache -->