[Review] Latest EOS 6D Reviews And Hands-on Round-Up (7D comparison and interview with Canon exec about 6D)
First week of EOS 6D is behind us. We aforesaid it (though we were wrong on the name), Canon made it. Now let’s see how the community is dealing with Canon’s new, entry level full frame DSLR, of which Canon says it is the smallest and lightest full-frame DSLR to date. The EOS 6D is clearly countering Nikon’s D600 ($2100). The EOS 6D is also Canon’s first EOS DSLR with built-in WiFi and GPS. This means you can change your camera settings, geotag photos and transfer your shots to your smartphone (or ipad, Android tablet etc) using Canon’s free iOS and Android apps. The 6D costs $2100 and can be per-ordered at the following shops (click on shop name):
Btw, I think the EF 17-40mm f/4L USM (around $700, click here) is the perfect lens for this full frame camera, and, with a price of around $700, it is one of the more affordable L lenses in Canon’s line-up.
Cameralabs published a preview and an interview with the European Product Manager, Richard Shepherd (video above). Another preview comes from The Onlinephotographer. If you guess which camera among the EOS 6D and the EOS 7D is the right one for you, then you should have a look at Digitalcameraworld, since they are tackling this very question. Read the article, since it is comparing both cams on a detailed basis. However, here is a short sum-up:
Reasons to buy the Canon 6D
- Its much larger sensor (more than 2.5x larger than the 7D), and all the creative possibilities it affords
- Higher sensitivity and better low-light performance
- Wi-Fi capability
- GPS functionality
- HDR function
- Smaller and lighter
Reasons to buy the Canon 7D
- Faster continuous shooting rate
- More cross-type focus points (19 vs 11)
- More viewfinder coverage (100% vs 97%)
- Faster maximum shutter speed (1/8000sec vs 1/4000sec)
- Much cheaper
Next hands-on preview comes from ephotozine, lots of pics of the camera itself. Finally, there is Petapixel’s Michael Zhang who had his hands on the EOS 6D and is sharing its thoughts.
I have also an interview with Mike Owen, Professional Image Marketing Manager for Canon Europe Ltd, made by Imaging Resource founder and publisher Dave Etchells. The interview is rather long and mainly about the EOS 6D (but not only). Regarding the sensor resolution:
We very much feel that that resolution, 20 to 22 megapixels on a full frame sensor is the real sweet spot. It’s the maximum that we can get to without starting to see a conflict between noise performance and resolution. And obviously, what we want to try to do is give you the best possible balance. And over the last few years, what you’ve seen is that other manufacturers have been sort of creeping up with their resolution. But we’ve reached a sort of sweet spot since 5 years ago when we launched the 1DS Mark III. And we think that, at the moment, that is the better place to be in terms of performance, allowing people to have the high ISO capabilities–high as you’re able to get with the current Canon range as well as the high resolution and image quality.
About the auto-focus system and the reasons for having just one cross type sensor:
I mean, yes, there is the cost side of things, but what we’ve tried to do with the autofocus system on the 6D is to actually improve low-light performance. It goes down to EV -3. So when emphasizing low-light performance, we’ve always had to make elements of the AF system larger, which limits our ability to put in more cross-type points.
Finally, below you find a video hands-on review by DigitalCameraWorld.
EOS 6D price check: Amazon, B&H, Adorama, Canon USA, J&R, Digitalrev, eBay, rent it at Borrow Lenses
EF 17-40mm f/4L USM price check: Amazon, B&H, Adorama, Canon USA, J&R, Digitalrev, eBay, rent it at Borrow Lenses






norber
9 months ago |no competition to the D600.
the 6D is a camera for amateurs who want FF.
people who don´t care about a 100% VF, sync speed, card slots, or AF points.
instead they are lured to buy this camera with social media crap “transfer your images to facebook with builin wifi”.
the D600 is a camera aimed at photographer.
as someone who has no canon glass i would always choose the D600.
unfortunately im a canon user since the AE-1.
norber
9 months ago |btw .. how can you trust a review whwn they get the very basics wrong??
“•More cross-type focus points (19 vs 11)”
i think most of us would be happy when the 6D HAD 11 cross type focus points.. but it has ONLY ONE.
wonder what else is wrong with their review….
Blackjack
9 months ago |“More cross-type focus points (19 vs 11)”
11 cross-type on the 6D? had read that only the center is cross-type.
chmee
9 months ago |i do not understand, why the 6D is compared to the 7D.. thats senseless..
Khooby
9 months ago |So there’s a trade-off between low-light focusing capability and the number of cross-type points? Okay, if that’s true I can understand it that.
Sync speed isn’t much lower than the D600. In both cases it’s a deal breaker for those who use flash extensively.
What I really don’t understand is why on EARTH they chose SD cards over CF cards, 97% coverage, the 60D control layout (instead of the second spinning dial of the 7D/5D), and yes- why wifi/GPS at all?!
justin
9 months ago |there is no question that the 6D is top expensiv for what it offers.
the VF is worse then the 5D MK2
less resolution then the 5D Mk2
the image quality seems to be the same as the 5D MK2
only SD card slot
the sync speed is worse then the 5D MK2
the build quality is worse then the 5D MK2
the ergonomics are worse then the 5D MK2
and what do you gain?
a digi 5 processor you won´t notice. not as RAW shooter anyway.
a marginal better AF.. at least for near dark scenes.
WIFI and GPS.. both features cost next to nothing to build in.
you can buy wifi USB sticks for 10 euro and GPS tracker for 15 euro.
so nobody can tell me these features make the camera so expensiv.
the 6D is WORTH around 1300 euro.. not more.
jake
8 months ago |I will take -3ev AF any day over 39pt AF in the D600, the D600 AF is the same AF in the D7k that I actually use almost every day and I know it is not Nikon’s best AF. Infact ,it is very slow and much less accurate than the AF in my D90.
Also, you should know the 39ptNikon Af has always hunting in low light issue.
So, how many AF points a camera gets is not a very important issue but how many actually working (usable)AF points and how it handles lowlight is a much more important issue.
Dave
8 months ago |I like a lot of the specs, but think Canon missed the mark on this camera. I don’t mind the 20MP with the high sensitivity, but should have used the 22MP from the 5D3, dropped the GPS, had a CF slot instead of SD, and a pop up flash. The deal breakers for me is no CF slot bad button arrangement on the back, low flash sync speed, 1/4000 top shutter speed, 100K shutter life, not a full magnesium body, and lower FPS speed. Could I live with it, probably, but I would feel that I had compromised too much. Would rather spring for a 5D Mark III for all the extra goodies it affords.
Henry
6 months ago |Dave, I feel your pain. But Canon is just trying to up their game in the midst of the craziness that is the Mirrorless segment. You want FF goodness, pay $2000. If you want pro level AF like D700/D3s, pay $3500, sukerzz!!
I hate this marketing game, but there is nobody else in the market that offers what Canon and Nikon offers.
Sony A99 is looking pretty good alternative I think. What Canon needs to worry is the fact that Sony has filed a patent for Foveon style sensor which could dramatically improves the color rendering, saturation and noise of the digital image. Sigma has been using this sensor type for years but nobody seems to champion it.
canon eos 6d
5 months ago |Fantastic beat ! I would like to apprentice at the same time as you amend your web site, how can i subscribe for a weblog website? The account helped me a applicable deal. I were tiny bit acquainted of this your broadcast provided vivid clear concept