<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rumor: Canon EOS 7D Mark II Specs And Release Date (and 3D tidbits)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonwatch.com/rumor-canon-eos-7d-mark-ii-specs-and-release-date-and-3d-tidbits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonwatch.com/rumor-canon-eos-7d-mark-ii-specs-and-release-date-and-3d-tidbits/</link>
	<description>Canon Rumors and News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:24:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Raid</title>
		<link>http://www.canonwatch.com/rumor-canon-eos-7d-mark-ii-specs-and-release-date-and-3d-tidbits/#comment-25053</link>
		<dc:creator>Raid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 22:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonwatch.com/?p=9123#comment-25053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[YES, I agree with you. Over the ISO 800 it is very noisy. Even at 800 or 400 there are noses, but it is easy to fix in Lightroom. Anyhow, I think Canon will address the this. they did with 5D II, III, T4i, T5i.

If Canon will significant improve the ISO and make it 10fps, 21MP, 31 All across point focus, then the 5D III owner will put 5D III under the hummer :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YES, I agree with you. Over the ISO 800 it is very noisy. Even at 800 or 400 there are noses, but it is easy to fix in Lightroom. Anyhow, I think Canon will address the this. they did with 5D II, III, T4i, T5i.</p>
<p>If Canon will significant improve the ISO and make it 10fps, 21MP, 31 All across point focus, then the 5D III owner will put 5D III under the hummer <img src='http://www.canonwatch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn M. Knox</title>
		<link>http://www.canonwatch.com/rumor-canon-eos-7d-mark-ii-specs-and-release-date-and-3d-tidbits/#comment-22665</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn M. Knox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 13:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonwatch.com/?p=9123#comment-22665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you are not seeing any noise quality issues with the 7D then, with all  due respect, you have little or no experience with what the standard for a high file quality should be (shooting in jpg doesn&#039;t solve the noise problems with this camera).  The 7D is no where near the best camera Canon has made and, in fact, I would say it is probably one of the worst bodies they&#039;ve made, excepting that the camera does excel on the video end.  There is significant noise beyond ISO 800, although the files are still usable but ISO 3200 is the absolute limit.  This is a very antiquated camera now when you consider that the newer sensors on a camera like the 5D Mark III will shoot clean files in excess of ISO 12000.  The files from the 40D were just as good, if not better than the 7D.

I had one of the early 7D and I can attest to the serious problems that the early cameras had with sharpness and focus.  I got rid of that body a couple years ago.  After the recent price drop I decided to give it another shot and bought a new recently manufactured body.  While it appeared that the sharpness issues had been resolved, for the most part, even the newer makes are mostly unimpressive.  Focus on this camera when tracking moving subjects is still sub-par.  When shooting a typical sporting event it is not uncommon to get a 50% in-focus burst even when the subject is moving toward you (as opposed to moving across the plane). The center point focus is really the only one that is usable for moving subjects as none of the other focus setting can produce consistently in-focus shots of moving subjects.  Contrary to what some have proclaimed, the focus system is not so advanced that is difficult for the user to find the right settings, it is just that this camera&#039;s focusing system is simply not very good for moving subjects.  In fact, I found that the 9-point focus system on the 40d and 5DmkII, respectively, were just about as good as the 70d&#039;s for moving objects.  Of course, neither of those cameras fps are close to the 7D&#039;s.

This camera has probably been Canon&#039;s most hyped body and for those that had the mistaken impression (like me) that is was a viable and dependable backup to your 1D series camera it has been a complete bust.  If you think this is a great body then that&#039;s fine since it is your opinion but I really think the only person that could objectively say that this is a great camera is someone that has never shot with a higher performance camera.  I would take a used 1DmkII over this camera every day of the week.

That being said, Canon is producing some amazing camera now, such as the 5DmkIII, which is worth every penny in my opinion.  It&#039;s a little slow in fps for some sports action but given that the focusing system is incredibly good I would say that I get many more in-focus shots from it then with 7D and almost as many than with the 1DmkIV, even though that camera shoots almost twice as many fps.

Let&#039;s hope that Canon does not release the 7dmkII with all of the noise problems the 7D has.  If it&#039;s a 1.6x crop then you can&#039;t expect it to be as good as a 5D or 1D but it has to be significantly improved in relation to original 7D or I can&#039;t buy it.  Given that the 1D cameras have all gone to &quot;full crop&quot; senors my suggestion to Canon would be to adopt the 1.3x cropped used in the previous 1Ds.

Also, Canon really has got to step up their releases on new cameras.  It is really annoying watching Nikon releases all of these new bodies and Canon still having cameras on that market that are 3.5+ years old (7D) and nearly 3 years old (60D).  Given current technology advances these camera are well out dated.  If the 7D is able to adopt the focus system of the 5DmkIII and at least borrow some of the clean file technology up to, say ISO 8000, then this camera will be a winner, if not, the 7dII will be every bit the dog that the 7d is for more advance and professional shooters (my apologies to dogs for the insult).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are not seeing any noise quality issues with the 7D then, with all  due respect, you have little or no experience with what the standard for a high file quality should be (shooting in jpg doesn&#8217;t solve the noise problems with this camera).  The 7D is no where near the best camera Canon has made and, in fact, I would say it is probably one of the worst bodies they&#8217;ve made, excepting that the camera does excel on the video end.  There is significant noise beyond ISO 800, although the files are still usable but ISO 3200 is the absolute limit.  This is a very antiquated camera now when you consider that the newer sensors on a camera like the 5D Mark III will shoot clean files in excess of ISO 12000.  The files from the 40D were just as good, if not better than the 7D.</p>
<p>I had one of the early 7D and I can attest to the serious problems that the early cameras had with sharpness and focus.  I got rid of that body a couple years ago.  After the recent price drop I decided to give it another shot and bought a new recently manufactured body.  While it appeared that the sharpness issues had been resolved, for the most part, even the newer makes are mostly unimpressive.  Focus on this camera when tracking moving subjects is still sub-par.  When shooting a typical sporting event it is not uncommon to get a 50% in-focus burst even when the subject is moving toward you (as opposed to moving across the plane). The center point focus is really the only one that is usable for moving subjects as none of the other focus setting can produce consistently in-focus shots of moving subjects.  Contrary to what some have proclaimed, the focus system is not so advanced that is difficult for the user to find the right settings, it is just that this camera&#8217;s focusing system is simply not very good for moving subjects.  In fact, I found that the 9-point focus system on the 40d and 5DmkII, respectively, were just about as good as the 70d&#8217;s for moving objects.  Of course, neither of those cameras fps are close to the 7D&#8217;s.</p>
<p>This camera has probably been Canon&#8217;s most hyped body and for those that had the mistaken impression (like me) that is was a viable and dependable backup to your 1D series camera it has been a complete bust.  If you think this is a great body then that&#8217;s fine since it is your opinion but I really think the only person that could objectively say that this is a great camera is someone that has never shot with a higher performance camera.  I would take a used 1DmkII over this camera every day of the week.</p>
<p>That being said, Canon is producing some amazing camera now, such as the 5DmkIII, which is worth every penny in my opinion.  It&#8217;s a little slow in fps for some sports action but given that the focusing system is incredibly good I would say that I get many more in-focus shots from it then with 7D and almost as many than with the 1DmkIV, even though that camera shoots almost twice as many fps.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope that Canon does not release the 7dmkII with all of the noise problems the 7D has.  If it&#8217;s a 1.6x crop then you can&#8217;t expect it to be as good as a 5D or 1D but it has to be significantly improved in relation to original 7D or I can&#8217;t buy it.  Given that the 1D cameras have all gone to &#8220;full crop&#8221; senors my suggestion to Canon would be to adopt the 1.3x cropped used in the previous 1Ds.</p>
<p>Also, Canon really has got to step up their releases on new cameras.  It is really annoying watching Nikon releases all of these new bodies and Canon still having cameras on that market that are 3.5+ years old (7D) and nearly 3 years old (60D).  Given current technology advances these camera are well out dated.  If the 7D is able to adopt the focus system of the 5DmkIII and at least borrow some of the clean file technology up to, say ISO 8000, then this camera will be a winner, if not, the 7dII will be every bit the dog that the 7d is for more advance and professional shooters (my apologies to dogs for the insult).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omar Spence</title>
		<link>http://www.canonwatch.com/rumor-canon-eos-7d-mark-ii-specs-and-release-date-and-3d-tidbits/#comment-22214</link>
		<dc:creator>Omar Spence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 02:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonwatch.com/?p=9123#comment-22214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the right post processing I can get cleam images from my 550D at ISO3200. It is plainly obvious that shooting in low light requires a different approach in post in order to produce good results. Once the light gets dim there is no quick &amp; easy, forget the JPEG, forget any lens slower than F/2.8. You will need more serious noise removal tools. G&#039;MIC for Gimp is the best I&#039;ve seen so far. It is very slow but very good. JPG is not for anyone who is serious anout what they are doing, but then a shoddy workman always blames his tools.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the right post processing I can get cleam images from my 550D at ISO3200. It is plainly obvious that shooting in low light requires a different approach in post in order to produce good results. Once the light gets dim there is no quick &amp; easy, forget the JPEG, forget any lens slower than F/2.8. You will need more serious noise removal tools. G&#8217;MIC for Gimp is the best I&#8217;ve seen so far. It is very slow but very good. JPG is not for anyone who is serious anout what they are doing, but then a shoddy workman always blames his tools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.canonwatch.com/rumor-canon-eos-7d-mark-ii-specs-and-release-date-and-3d-tidbits/#comment-21736</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2013 06:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonwatch.com/?p=9123#comment-21736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do we really need more  megapixels? What we do need is better video quality, Better quality audio with the ability to record in full studio quality like others do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do we really need more  megapixels? What we do need is better video quality, Better quality audio with the ability to record in full studio quality like others do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lars Åke</title>
		<link>http://www.canonwatch.com/rumor-canon-eos-7d-mark-ii-specs-and-release-date-and-3d-tidbits/#comment-20283</link>
		<dc:creator>Lars Åke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 11:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonwatch.com/?p=9123#comment-20283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well if you guys shoot to JPG I cant really comment on if there are noise issues or not. I havent even looked at the JPGs so far after owning a mk1 almost 2 years. I take 100% RAW and I have no noticeable issues with noise around 600.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well if you guys shoot to JPG I cant really comment on if there are noise issues or not. I havent even looked at the JPGs so far after owning a mk1 almost 2 years. I take 100% RAW and I have no noticeable issues with noise around 600.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yzf</title>
		<link>http://www.canonwatch.com/rumor-canon-eos-7d-mark-ii-specs-and-release-date-and-3d-tidbits/#comment-20199</link>
		<dc:creator>yzf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 05:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonwatch.com/?p=9123#comment-20199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bla bla bla . . .
Oh the noise . . .
Bla bla bla . . .
The 7D is the best camera that Canon has produced.
Extremely responsive, with very little latency.
Extremely effective with moving subjects.
Very detailed picture with L lenses.
If you want to take pictures at night, you can try a thermographic camera...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bla bla bla . . .<br />
Oh the noise . . .<br />
Bla bla bla . . .<br />
The 7D is the best camera that Canon has produced.<br />
Extremely responsive, with very little latency.<br />
Extremely effective with moving subjects.<br />
Very detailed picture with L lenses.<br />
If you want to take pictures at night, you can try a thermographic camera&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 9/19 queries in 0.006 seconds using apc
Object Caching 362/380 objects using apc

 Served from: canonwatch.com @ 2013-05-22 00:27:24 by W3 Total Cache -->