Today a bunch of Canon firmware updates was released for mirrorless cameras. Not much to write home about, besides the support for the RF-S 10-18mm F4.5-6.3 IS STM lens.
Canon EOS R50 firmware version 1.1.0 (download) incorporates the following fixes and enhancements:
Adds support for RF-S 10-18mm F4.5-6.3 IS STM lens.
Adds support for the Software Development Assistance Kit (EDSDK/CCAPI).
Fixes minor issues.
Canon EOS R10 firmware version 1.4.0 (download) incorporates the following fixes and enhancements:
Adds support for RF-S 10-18mm F4.5-6.3 IS STM lens.
Fixes minor issues.
Canon EOS R6 firmware version 1.8.3 (download) incorporates the following fixes and enhancements:
Fixes an issue, in which, after touchscreen operation, in rare circumstances, the camera operations cannot be performed, and even if the camera is operated, [BUSY] appears on the screen.
Fixes minor issues.
Canon EOS R7 firmware version 1.4.0 (download) incorporates the following fixes and enhancements:
Adds support for RF-S 10-18mm F4.5-6.3 IS STM lens.
Fixes minor issues.
Canon EOS R8 firmware version 1.2.0 (download) incorporates the following fixes and enhancements:
Adds support for RF-S 10-18mm F4.5-6.3 IS STM lens.
Fixes minor issues.
Canon EOS R3 firmware version 1.5.1 (download) incorporates the following fixes and enhancements:
Adds support for RF-S 10-18mm F4.5-6.3 IS STM lens.
Fixes an issue that may cause the camera, in rare instances, to experience a delayed restart after the camera has gone into Auto Power Off.
Coming from our friends at Mirrorless Comparison, here is a neat Canon EOS R7 vs EOS R8 comparison review. The 10 main differences are:
Sensor: The R7 offers higher resolution, but the larger sensor of the R8 delivers greater dynamic range and less noise at high ISO.
Video: Sharpness and dynamic range are very similar, but the R8 provides better quality in 4K 50/60p due to oversampling, while the R7 employs line-skipping. The full-frame camera also exhibits less rolling shutter and noise at high ISO. On the other hand, the APS-C model excels in internal heat management.
Stabilisation: The R8 lacks in-body stabilization, requiring reliance on lenses with optical stabilization. This gives the R7 and its IBIS mechanism an advantage in scenarios involving slow shutter speeds, or when walking during video sequences. Surprisingly, the R8 paired with an IS lens performs better when recording static shots.
Shutter Mode: The R8 doesn’t feature a full mechanical shutter, utilizing only the EFCS (Electronic-First Curtain Shutter), which can introduce limitations under specific conditions and settings.
Continuous Shooting Speed: With the electronic shutter, the R7 operates at up to 30fps, while the R8 achieves a faster 40fps. The full-frame camera exhibits less rolling shutter, a weak point in the R7. The buffer performance is more or less comparable.
Autofocus: The R8 employs more advanced software, resulting in better detection of humans, animals, and vehicles. It also offers greater consistency in keeper rate and focus precision, especially in low-light conditions and when capturing birds in flight.
Design: The R7 boasts a larger grip, an AF joystick, and additional buttons. The EVF and LCD screen remain the same.
Battery Life: The R7 employs a larger battery and can last significantly longer, particularly in video mode.
SD Cards: Only the R7 comes equipped with two card slots.
Price and Lenses: The cost is relatively close in the U.S., but the R8 is pricier in Europe. Currently, there are only three native RF lenses designed for APS-C cameras. R7 users must rely on full-frame EOS R lenses or adapt Canon’s DSLR lenses. Support for third-party brands remains uncertain at the moment.
Read the full and exhaustive Canon EOS R7 vs EOS R8 review at Mirrorless Comparison, it comes with charts, ISO comparison and everything your pixel peeping heart might wish. Or you can watch the video below.
DPReview posted a Canon EOS R7 review, and while it is not exhaustive like previous reviews, it sill delivers a lot of useful information. The gave the EOS R7 an 87% overall score and a Silver Award. From DPReview’s conclusion:
What we like
What we don’t
– Good APS-C image quality with attractive out-of-camera JPEGs – 15 fps mechanical shutter with AF Deep buffer for burst shooting – Reliable AF tracking during stills photography – Subject-specific AF tracking modes – Highly-detailed 4K video 10-bit video capture in C-Log or as out-of-camera HDR footage – Effective in-body image stabilization for slow-motion stills and handheld video – Solid build quality and handling with weather-sealing – Familiar design for former DSLR users – Twin card slots Decent battery life
– Lack of RF-S lenses at the moment – AF joystick awkwardly recessed within rear command dial – Rolling shutter effect in 4K footage – AF tracking during video tends to drift in low light – 2.36M-dot EVF is a bit underwhelming for the price
This website or its third-party tools use cookies, which are necessary to its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy. If you want to know more or withdraw your consent to all or some of the cookies, please refer to the cookie policy. By closing this banner you agree to the use of cookies.