It seems Sony got it, eventually. The Sony a6400 is not overheating.
David Oastler tested the new Sony a6400 and he found no overheating issues. Bad news for those who fancied to fry their eggs with a Sony, good news for those who still think they might get a serious camera from Sony.
[via Sony Alpha Rumors]
Can it really be that the APS-C Sony a6400 is so much better than the full frame Canon EOS RP when it comes to video performance?
Max Yuryev seem to think so, and explains his point in the video below.
[via Sony Alpha Rumors]
Rage Studios posted a short video where they compare the color rendition of the Fujifilm XT3, the Canon EOS M50, and the Sony A6300.
Needless to say that here at CW we firmly believe nothing can beat Canon’s color science.
DPReview compares the Canon EOS R with the Nikon Z 6 with the Sony a7 III. Not surprisingly DPReview thinks that Canon and Nikon can not hold up t the Sony a7 III.
From their conclusion:
Even without thinking about lenses, it’s clear that Nikon and Canon still have some work to do to catch up with Sony’s half-decade headstart. It’s not an insurmountable difference, though and both brands have brought their extensive experience of ergonomics and user interfaces, which Sony should probably be worried about.
All three cameras can produce excellent images but the Sony more readily adapts to a wider range of situations. The Nikon acquits itself well for certain types of photography, while also doing unexpectedly well at video, but the Z 6 has the least dependable AF system of the trio, which counts against it. Canon has tried to make an easy-to-use camera, rather than simply mimicking its DSLRs, but, while we’re not fully convinced by the results of this first attempt, it’s still a very able camera.
Ultimately, though, the decision is likely to come down to what lenses you own, which lenses you plan to buy and how much faith you have in each company to produce camera bodies to match your needs, several years down the road. Because, if you’re trying to avoid major costs later, the camera body you choose now is likely to commit you to a new lens system for the foreseeable future. Read the comparison here…
While it is true that Sony has a better sensor performance, there is little more than this. Ergonomics on Sony’s a7 III are terrible, for instance. This kind of review/comparison does not take into account a lot of parameters, like reliability, lens ecosystem, customer service, color science, just to name a few. Judging a camera based solely on the sensor performance seems a bit of a stretch to us.
Canon EOS R:
America: B&H Photo, Adorama, Amazon USA, Amazon Canada, Canon Canada, Canon USA
Europe & UK: Amazon DE, Amazon UK, Amazon IT, Canon IT, WEX Photographic, Canon FR, Canon UK, Canon DE
The Slanted Lens compares the Canon EOS R with the Nikon Z7 with the Sony a7 III.
Dynamic range, tonality, sharpness and detail, high ISO, auto focus, and video in 4K and 1080p modes, they’re all put under scrutiny. There is one camera that apparently fails on a lot of categories. Guess which?
Chris and Jordan compare the current generation entry-level full frame mirrorless models from each company: the Nikon Z6, Sony a7 III, and Canon EOS R. Watch their analysis to find out where they think each model excels or has room to grow.
Canon EOS R: B&H Photo, Adorama, Amazon USA, Amazon Canada, Canon Canada, Canon USA
Nikon Z6: B&H Photo, Adorama, Amazon USA, Amazon Canada, Canon Canada, Canon USA
Sony a7 III: B&H Photo, Adorama, Amazon USA, Amazon Canada, Canon Canada, Canon USA
Notice
This website or its third-party tools use cookies, which are necessary to its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy. If you want to know more or withdraw your consent to all or some of the cookies, please refer to the cookie policy.
By closing this banner you agree to the use of cookies.